She claimed Meghan had filed to protect the name “Lilibet” before the child was even born, supposedly for future branding, merchandise, or organizational use.
“This name belonged to the Queen’s childhood, her family, her loved ones,” Levin said. “It was incredibly intimate. People will see the name and think the Queen endorsed commercial products. It’s shocking.”
Presenter Eamonn Holmes reacted in disbelief:
“What do you mean? They copyrighted the name?”
Levin’s answer was blunt: “Yes.”
The accusations paint an increasingly tense picture of the fractured relationship between the Sussexes and the monarchy.
However, the couple’s spokesperson hit back, insisting:
“The duke spoke with his family in advance… his grandmother was the first person he called. Had she not been supportive, they would not have used the name.”
The clash over one of the Queen’s most sacred nicknames has now exploded into yet another controversy — one that shows no signs of quieting.
