At the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday, Judge Sir Geoffrey Vos said that even though the duke’s concerns about safety were “powerful and moving”, his “sense of grievance” did not “translate into a legal argument”.

In a statement, Buckingham Palace said: “All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion.”

It’s believed that the King felt it wouldn’t have been right, from a constitutional point of view, to get involved while the case was still under government and court review.

Harry ‘let down’ by ruling

In the interview, Prince Harry explained that due to the security situation, he doesn’t “see a world in which I would be bringing my wife and children back to the UK at this point.”

He shared that he felt “let down” and described the situation as “a good old-fashioned establishment stitch-up.” He also said he’s concerned that the decision creates “a new precedent that security can be used to control members of the family.”

Prince Harry went on to say he believes “what it does is imprison other members of the family from being able to choose a different life,” and added:
“If, for me, security is conditional on having an official role – one that both myself and my wife wish to carry on, but then was rejected… by the Royal Household – and the result to that is you lose your security.

“That basically says you can’t live outside of their control if you want to be safe.”

Duke: PM should ‘step in’

‘All I’ve been asking for is safety’

On Friday night, Prince Harry issued a statement criticizing Ravec for not doing a yearly risk review, saying it showed a lack of basic care for his safety. He plans to write to the Home Secretary to request a review and called the legal action “a last resort” that uncovered “shocking truths.” Harry added, “All I’ve been asking for is safety,” and reaffirmed his commitment to public service.